Click on the items listed below to see some recent research material.

·  Working Papers on Robustness

·  Published Papers on Robustness

·  Working Papers on Risk and Valuation

·  Published Papers on Risk and Valuation

·  Working Papers on Operator Methods

·  Published Papers on Operator Methods

·  Working Papers on GMM

·  Published Work on GMM


Research on Robustness

 

Working Papers on Robustness [top]

  • "Robustness, Estimation and Detection," with T. J. Sargent (November 7 , 2009).

We propose adjustments for model ambiguity that survive in continuous time limits. Our formulations emerge from continuous-time versions of two discrete-time recursive models that Hansen and Sargent (2007) used for a decision maker who knows neither models nor distributions of unobserved states. We use expectations of likelihood ratios (relative entropies) to measure concerns about model misspecification and exploit the role of relative entropies in statistical methods for using historical data to discriminate between probability models. Statistical detection motivates our adjustment for model ambiguity and also helps us calibrate parameters that measure model ambiguity.

  • "Doubts or Variability?" with F. Barillas and T. J. Sargent, forthcoming in Journal of Economic Theory. [LINK]

Abstract: Reinterpreting most of the market price of risk as a price of model uncertainty eradicates a link between asset prices and measures of the welfare costs of aggregate fluctuations that was proposed by Hansen et al., Tallarini, and Alvarez and Jermann [Lars Peter Hansen, Thomas Sargent, Thomas Tallarini, Robust permanent income and pricing, Rev. Econ. Stud. 66 (1999) 873–907; Thomas D. Tallarini, Risk-sensitive real business cycles, J. Monet. Econ. 45 (3) (2000) 507–532; Fernando Alvarez, Urban J. Jermann, Using asset prices to measure the cost of business cycles, J. Polit. Econ. 112 (6) (2004) 1223–1256]. Prices of model uncertainty contain information about the benefits of removing model uncertainty, not the consumption fluctuations that Lucas [Robert E. Lucas Jr., Models of Business Cycles, Basil Blackwell, Oxford and New York, 1987; Robert E. Lucas Jr., Macroeconomic priorities, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 93 (2003) 1–14] studied. A max–min expected utility theory lets us reinterpret Tallarini's risk-aversion parameter as measuring a representative consumer's doubts about the model specification. We use model detection instead of risk-aversion experiments to calibrate that parameter. Plausible values of detection error probabilities give prices of model uncertainty that approach the Hansen and Jagannathan [Lars Peter Hansen, Ravi Jagannathan, Implications of security market data for models of dynamic economies, J. Polit. Econ.99 (1991) 225–262] bounds. Fixed detection error probabilities give rise to virtually identical asset prices as well as virtually identical costs of model uncertainty for Tallarini's two models of consumption growth.

  • "Fragile Beliefs and the price of uncertainty," with T. J. Sargent (March 5 , 2009).

Abstract: Concerns about misspecification and an enduring model selection problem in which one of the models has long run risks give rise to countercyclical risk premia. We use two risk-sensitivity operators to construct the stochastic discount factor for a representative consumer who evaluates consumption streams in light of model selection and parameter estimation problems that can aggravate or attenuate long run risks as time passes. The arrival of signals induces the consumer to alter his posterior distribution over models and parameters. The consumer copes with specification doubts by slanting probabilities pessimistically. These pessimistic model probabilities induce model uncertainty premia that contribute a time-varying component to what is ordinarily measured as the market price of risk.

  • "Risk and Robustness in Equilibrium," with E. W. Anderson and T. J. Sargent ,(March 8, 1998)

This early paper gives a continuous-time, stochastic formulation of robust control theory and a characterization of prices. While this paper was substantially revised and given a new title, the original manuscript remains interesting and is cited in our subsequent work.  This paper provided the impetus for much of our subsequent work.

Link to the volume

 

Published Papers on Robustness [top]

  • “Beliefs, Doubts and Learning: Valuing Macroeconomic Risk,” Richard T. Ely Lecture, The American Economic Review Vol. 97, No. 2, May 2007. [LINK]  [Ely Lecture Errata ]

 

Abstract: This essay examines the problem of inference within a rational expectations model from two perspectives: that of an econometrician and that of the economic agents within the model. The assumption of rational expectations has been and remains an important component to quantitative research. It endows economic decision makers with knowledge of the probability law implied by the economic model. As such, it is an equilibrium concept. Imposing rational expectations removed from consideration the need for separately specifying beliefs or subjective components of uncertainty. Thus, it simplified model specification and implied an array of testable implications that are different from those considered previously. It reframed policy analysis by questioning the effectiveness of policy levers that induce outcomes that differ systematically from individual beliefs.


  • “Robustness and U.S. Monetary Policy Experimentation,” with T. Cogley, R. Colacito and T.J. Sargent, Forthcoming, Journal of Money Credit and Banking, (August 8, 2008).
  •  

    Abstract: We study how a concern for robustness modifies a policy marker’s incentive to experiment. A policy maker has a prior over two submodels of inflation-unemployment dynamics. One submodel implies an exploitable trade-off, the other does not. Bayes’ law gives the policy maker an incentive to experiment. The policy maker fears that both submodels and his prior probability distribution over them is misspecified. We compute decision rules that are robust to misspecifications of each submodel and of the prior distribution over submodels. We compare robust rules to ones that Cogley, Colacito and Sargent (2007) computed assuming that the models and the prior distribution are correctly specified. We explain how the policy maker’s desires to protect against misspecifications of the submodels, on the one hand, and misspecifications of the prior over them, on the other, have different effects on the decision rule.

    • "Robust Estimation and Control without Commitment," with T. J. Sargent, Journal of Economic Theory, 136 (2007) 1-27.

    Abstract: In a Markov decision problem with hidden state variables, a posterior distribution serves as a state variable and Bayes’ law under an approximating model gives its law of motion. A decision maker expresses fear that his model is misspecified by surrounding it with a set of alternatives that are nearby when measured by their expected log likelihood ratios (entropies). Martingales represent alternative models. A decision maker constructs a sequence of robust decision rules by pretending that a sequence of minimizing players choose increments to martingales and distortions to the prior over the hidden state. A risk sensitivity operator induces robustness to perturbations of the approximating model conditioned on the hidden state. Another risk sensitivity operator induces robustness to the prior distribution over the hidden state. We use these operators to extend the approach of Hansen and Sargent [Discounted linear exponential quadratic Gaussian control, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 40(5) (1995) 968–971] to problems that contain hidden states. 

    • "Robust Control and Model Misspecification," with T. J. Sargent, G. Turmuhambetova, and N. Williams, Journal of Economic Theory, 128 (2006) 45-90.  

    Abstract: A decision maker fears that data are generated by a staistical perturbation of an approximating model that is either a controlled difussion or a controlled measure over continuous functions of time. A perturbation is constrained by relative entropy. Several two-palyer zero-sum games yield robust decision rules and are related to one another and to max-min expected utility theory of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989). Alternative sequential and non-sequential versions of robust control theory present identical robust decision rules taht are dynamically consistent in a useful sense.

    • "Recursive Robust Estimation and Control under Commitment," with T. J. Sargent Journal of Economic Theory, 124 (2005) 258-301.

    Abstract: This paper studies robust decision problems with hidden state variables.  It gives the recursive implementation of the commitment solution with discounting from robust control theory.  The recursive implication shows formally how discounting and commitment are encoded in the robust decision rules.  We suggest alternative recursive formulations of the decision problem that are attractive alternatives to the commitment solution.

    • "Comment on Exotic Preferences for Macroeconomics by D. K. Backus, B. R. Routledge and S. E. Zin" , NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2004. Edited by M. Gertler and K. Rogoff.
    • "A Quartet of Semigroups for Model Specification, Robustness, Prices of Risk and Model Detection," E. W. Anderson, L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Journal of the European Economic Association, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2003. Link to the Issue

    Abstract: A representative agent fears that his model, a continuous time Markov process with jump and diffusion components, is misspecified and therefore uses robust control theory to make decisions. Under the decision maker’s approximating model, cautious behavior puts adjustments for model misspecification into market prices for risk factors. We use a statistical theory of detection to quantify how much model misspecification the decision maker should fear, given his historical data record. A semigroup is a collection of objects connected by something like the law of iterated expectations. The law of iterated expectations defines the semigroup for a Markov process, while similar laws define other semigroups. Related semigroups describe (1) an approximating model; (2) a model misspecification adjustment to the continuation value in the decision maker’s Bellman equation; (3) asset prices; and (4) the behavior of the model detection statistics that we use to calibrate how much robustness the decision maker prefers. Semigroups 2, 3, and 4 establish a tight link between the market price of uncertainty and a bound on the error in statistically discriminating between an approximating and a worst case model.

    • "Robust Control of Forward Looking Models," L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol 50, Issue 3, 2003. Link to the Issue

    Abstract: This paper shows how to formulate and compute robust Ramsey (aka Stackelberg) plans for linear models with forward-looking private agents. The leader and teh followers share a common approximating model and both have preferences for robust decision rules because both doubt the model. Since their preferences differ, the leader's and follower's decision rules are fragile to different misspecifications of the approximating model. To compute a Stackelberg equilibrium we formulate a Bellman equation that is associated to an artificial single-agent robust control problem. The artificial Bellman equation contains a description of the implementability constraints that include Euler equations that describe the worst-case analysis of the followers. As an example, the paper analyzes a model of a monopoly facing a competitive fringe.

     

    • "Robust Permanent Income and Pricing," L. P. Hansen, T. J. Sargent and T. D. Tallarini, Jr., Review of Economic Studies, 66, 1999. JSTOR link to the Issue

     



    Research on Risk and Valuation

     

    Working Papers on Risk and Valuation [top]

    • "Risk Price Dynamics," with José Scheinkman, Jaroslav Borovička, and Mark Hendricks (November 11, 2009).

    We present a novel approach to depicting asset pricing dynamics by characterizing shock exposures and prices for alternative investment horizons. We quantify the shock exposures in terms of elasticities that measure the impact of a current shock on future cash-flow growth. The elasticities are designed to accommodate nonlinearities in the stochastic evolution modeled as a Markov process. Stochastic growth in the underlying macroeconomy and stochastic discounting in the representation of asset values are central ingredients in our investigation. We provide elasticity calculations in a series of examples featuring consumption externalities, recursive utility, and jump risk.

    • "Pricing Growth-Rate Risk," with José Scheinkman (November 11, 2009).

    We characterize the compensation demanded by investors in equilibrium for in- cremental exposure to growth-rate risk. Given an underlying Markov di usion that governs the state variables in the economy, the economic model implies a stochas- tic discount factor process S and a reference stochastic growth process G for the macroeconomy. Both are modeled conveniently as multiplicative functionals of a multi- dimensional Brownian motion. To study pricing we consider the pricing implications of parameterized family of growth processes Gε, with Gº = G, as ε is made small. This parameterization de nes a direction of growth-rate risk exposure that is priced using the stochastic discount factor S. By changing the investment horizon we trace a term structure of risk prices that shows how the valuation of risky cash ows depends on the investment horizon. Using methods of Hansen and Scheinkman (2009), we characterize the limiting behavior of the risk prices as the investment horizon is made arbitrarily long.

    • "Pricing Kernels and Stochastic Discount Factors," with Eric Renault, forthcoming in the Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance. (May 22, 2009).

    In this entry we characterize pricing kernels or stochastic discount factors that are used to represent valuation operators in dynamic stochastic economies. A kernel is commonly used mathematical term used to represent an operator. The term stochastic discount factor extends concepts from economics and finance to include adjustments for risk. As we will see, there is a tight connection between the two terms. The terms pricing kernel and stochastic discount factor are often used interchangeably. After deriving convenient representations for prices, we provide several examples of stochastic discount factors and discuss econometric methods for estimation and testing of asset pricing models that restrict the stochastic discount factors.

    • "Modeling the Long Run: Valuation in Dynamic Stochastic Economies" , (August 5, 2008).

    I explore the equilibrium value implications of economic models that incorporate reactions to a stochastic environment. I propose a dynamic value decomposition (DVD) designed to distinguish components of an underlying economic model that influence values over long horizons from components that impact only the short run. To quantify the role of parameter sensitivity and to impute long-term risk prices, I develop an associated perturbation technique. Finally, I use DVD methods to study formally some example economies and to speculate about others. A DVD is enabled by constructing operators indexed by the elapsed time between the date of pricing and the date of the future payoff (i.e. the future realization of a consumption claim). Thus formulated, methods from applied mathematics permit me to characterize valuation behavior as the time between price determination and payoff realization becomes large. An outcome of this analysis is the construction of a multiplicative martingale component of a process that is used to represent valuation in a dynamic economy with stochastic growth. I contrast the differences in the applicability between this multiplicative martingale method and an additive martingale method familiar from time series analysis that is used to identify shocks with long-run economic consequences.

    • "Comment on Exotic Preferences for Macroeconomics by D. K. Backus, B. R. Routledge and S. E. Zin" , NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2004. Edited by M. Gertler and K. Rogoff.

    Link to the volume

    Published Papers on Risk and Valuation [top]

    • "Long Term Risk: an Operator Approach" , with J. Scheinkman, Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 177-234.

    Abstract: We build a familiy of valuation operators indexed by the increment of time between the payoff date and the current period value. These operators are necessarily related by what is know as the semigroup property or the The Law of Iterated Values. The operator formulation we develop provides a way to link short term risk adjustments to what happens in the medium and long term. We apply this apparatus to give a precise notion of a long term risk-return tradeoff.

    ·        "Consumption Strikes Back?: Measuring Long Run Risk", with J.C. Heaton and N. Li Journal of Political Economy, Vol 116, Issue 2, 2008, 260-302. Link to the Issue

    Abstract: We study structural models of stochastic discount factors and explore alternative methods of estimating such models using data on macroeconomic risk and asset returns. Particular attention is devoted to recursive utility models in which risk aversion can be modified without altering intertemporal substitution. We characterize the impact of changing the intertemporal substitution and risk aversion parameters on equilibrium short-run and long-run risk prices and on equilibrium wealth.

     

    ·        "Intertemporal Substitution and Risk Aversion", with John Heaton, Junghoon Lee, Nikolai Roussanov, Handbook of Econometrics, Vol 6, Part 1, 2007, 3967-4056. Link to the Issue

    Abstract: We characterize and measure a long-term risk-return trade-off for the valuation of cash flows exposed to fluctuations in macroeconomic growth. This trade-off features risk prices of cash flows that are realized far into the future but continue to be reflected in asset values. We apply this analysis to claims on aggregate cash flows and to cash flows from value and growth portfolios by imputing values to the long-run dynamic responses of cash flows to macroeconomic shocks. We explore the sensitivity of our results to features of the economic valuation model and of the model cash flow dynamics.

     

    • "Intangible Risk?" , L.P. Hansen, J.C. Heaton and N. Li, published in Measuring Capital in the New Economy (NBER Books), Corrado, Haltiwanger and Sichel, eds., pages 111-152, 2005 [LINK]

     

    • "Value in an Uncertain Economy" L.P. Hansen, Address at the 474th Convocation at the University of Chicago, 2004.

     



    Research on Operator Methods

     

    Working Papers on Operator Methods [top]

    • "Nonlinear Principal Components and Long Run Implications of Mutivariate Diffusions", with X. Chen and J. Scheinkman. (Annals of Statistics, Vol.37, No 6B, pp. 4279-4312 (2009)) PDF version

    We investigate a method for extracting nonlinear principal components (NPCs). These NPCs maximize variation subject to smoothness and orthogonality constraints; but we allow for a general class of constraints and multivariate probability densities, including densities without compact support and even densities with algebraic tails. We provide primitive sufficient conditions for the existence of these NPCs. By exploiting the theory of continuous-time, reversible Markov diffusion processes, we give a different interpretation of these NPCs and the smoothness constraints. When the diffusion matrix is used to enforce smoothness, the NPCs maximize long-run variation relative to the overall variation subject to orthogonality constraints. Moreover, the NPCs behave as scalar autoregressions with heteroskedastic innovations; this supports semiparametric identification and estimation of a multivariate reversible diffusion process and tests of the overidentifying restrictions implied by such a process from low-frequency data. We also explore implications for stationary, possibly nonreversible diffusion processes. Finally, we suggest a sieve method to estimate the NPCs from discretely-sampled data.

    • "Operator Methods for Continuous-Time Markov Processes", with Y. Ait-Sahalia and J. Scheinkman (August 18, 2008). Forthcoming in the Handbook of Financial Econometrics.

    Published Papers on Operator Methods [top]

    • "Nonlinearity and Temporal Dependence," with Xiaohong Chen and Marine Carrasco, (October 4, 2009), (forthcoming in Journal of Econometrics.)

    Nonlinearities in the drift and diffusion coefficients influence temporal dependence in diffusion models. We study this link using three measures of temporal dependence: ρ−mixing, β−mixing and α−mixing. Stationary diffusions that are ρ − mixing have mixing coefficients that decay exponentially to zero. When they fail to be ρ−mixing, they are still β−mixing and α−mixing; but coefficient decay is slower than exponential. For such processes we find transformations of the Markov states that have finite variances but infinite spectral densities at frequency zero. The resulting spectral densities behave like those of stochastic processes with long memory. Finally we show how state-dependent, Poisson sampling alters the temporal dependence.

    • "Long Term Risk: an Operator Approach," with J. Scheinkman (January 2009). Econometrica, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 177-234.

    We create an analytical structure that reveals the long-run risk-return relationship for nonlinear continuous-time Markov environments. We do so by studying an eigenvalue problem associated with a positive eigenfunction for a conveniently chosen family of valuation operators. The members of this family are indexed by the elapsed time between payoff and valuation dates, and they are necessarily related via a mathematical structure called a semigroup.We represent the semigroup using a positive process with three components: an exponential term constructed from the eigenvalue, a martingale, and a transient eigenfunction term. The eigenvalue encodes the risk adjustment, the martingale alters the probability measure to capture long-run approximation, and the eigenfunction gives the long-run dependence on the Markov state.We discuss sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the relevant eigenvalue and eigenfunction. By showing how changes in the stochastic growth components of cash flows induce changes in the corresponding eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, we reveal a long-run riskreturn trade-off.

    • "Spectral Methods for Identifying Scalar Diffusions" with Jose A. Scheinkman and Nizar Touzi, Journal of Econometrics 86, 1998, 1-32.

    Abstract: This paper shows how to identify nonparametrically scalar stationary difussions from discrete-time data. The local evolution of the diffusion is characterized by a drift and difussion coefficient along with the specification of boundary behavior. We recover this local evolution from two objects that can be inferred directly from discrete-time data: the stationary density and a conveniently chosen eigenvalue-eigenfunction pair of the conditional expectation operator over a unit interval of time. This construction also lends itself to a spectral characterization of the over-identifying restrictions implied by a scalar diffusion model of a discrete-time Markov process.

    • "Short-Term Interest Rates as Subordinated Diffusions", with T. G. Conley, E. G. J. Luttmer and J. A. Scheinkman, Review of Financial Studies Paper 10:3, Fall 1997, 525-577.

    Abstract: In this article we characterize and estimate the process for short-term interest rates using federal funds interest rate data. We presume we are observing a discrete-time sample of a stationary scalar diffusion. We concentrate in a class of models in which the local volatility elasticity is constant and the drift has a flexible specification. To accommodate missing observations and to break the link between "economic time" and calendar time, we model the sampling scheme as an increasing process that is not directly observed. We propose and implement two methods for estimation. We find evidence for a volatility elasticity between one and one-half and two. When interest rates are high, local mean reversion is small and the mechanics for introducing stationarity is the increased volatility of the diffusion process.

    • "Bootstrapping the Long Run" with T. G. Conley and W. F. Liu, Macroeconomic Dynamics Volume 1, Issue 2, 1997 279-311.(Link to the Issue)

    Abstract: We develop and apply bootstrap methods for diffusion models when fitted to the long run as characterized by the stationary distribution of the data. To obtain bootstrap refinements to statistical inference, we simulate candidate diffusion processes. We use these bootstrap methods to assess measurements of local mean reversion or “pull” to the center of the distribution for short-term interest rates. We also use them to evaluate the fit of the model to the empirical density.

    • "Back to the Future: Generating Moment Implications for Continuous Time Markov Processes" with Jose A. Scheinkman, Econometrica 63:4, 1995, 767-804.

    Abstract: Continuos-time Markov processes can be characterized conveniently by their infinitesimal generators. For such processes there exist forward and reverse-time generators. We show how to use those generators to construct moment conditions implied by stationary Markov processes. Generalized methods of moments estimators and tests can be constructed using these moment conditions. The resulting econometric mothods are to be applied to discrete-time data obtained by sampling continuous-time Markov processes.

     



    Research on GMM

    Working Papers on GMM [top]

    • "Underidentification?" with Manuel Arellano and Enrique Sentana (July 31, 2009) PDF icon

    Abstract: We develop methods for testing the hypothesis that an econometric model is underidentified and inferring the nature of the failed identification. By adopting a generalized method-of moments perspective, we feature directly the structural relations and we allow for nonlinearity in the econometric specification. We establish the link between a test for overidenti cation and our proposed test for underidentification. If, after attempting to replicate the structural relation, we find substantial evidence against the overidentifying restrictions of an augmented model, this is evidence against underidentification of the original model.

  • "Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimator: Unpublished Proofs"
  • Description: These are unpublished proofs for the Econometrica, 1982, paper : "Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators", Econometrica , Vol. 50, No. 4 (Jul., 1982), pp. 1029-1054. If you have access to JSTOR, click here to see the paper

    Published Material on GMM [top]

    • "Generalized Methods of Moments Estimation " (June 17, 2007)

    Description: GMM entry for the forthcoming Palgrave dictionary

    • "Generalized Methods of Moments: A Time Series Perspective " (2000)

    Description: It gives a perspective on the time series formulation and application of Generalized Method of Moments estimation. This file corresponds to the original paper that appeared later in the Encycopledia, somewhat modified and under the new title of 'Method of Moments'. The full reference for the published version is: International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, N. J. Smelser and P. B. Bates (editors), Pergamon: Oxford, 2000

    • "Interview with Lars Peter Hansen", E. Ghysels and A. Hall, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 4, 2002.