"If I owned Texas and Hell, I
would rent out Texas and live in Hell." - Philip Sheridan, major
general in the Civil War and military governor of Texas and Louisiana
afterwards
Since coming to Chicago, it has
increasingly pressed upon me how much the rest of the world's thoughts
about my home state seem to consist mostly of clichés from bad
1960s Westerns. Some of these clichés are true, of
course, so sorting out truth from fiction is no easy task. The
following is a thumbnail sketch modelled along Mark Rosenfelder's similar sketch
of American culture,
and since there's a lot of overlap, this may be seen as a set of
footnotes to Mark's. Needless to say, this should not be
taken as a guide to my own worldview.
A summer temperature of over 100
degrees F (about 38 degrees C) is not a strange
occurrence, and is in fact quite routine. But you
probably also see your share of torrential
downpours.
You take great pride in living in a
state that is not just physically larger than any other state (you
usually conveniently forget Alaska), you're also bigger than any
European state outside of Russia -- more than all of France and the UK
combined, along with an economy larger than all but the very largest
nations in the world. You probably take all
that land and wealth as a symbol of freedom and opportunity, no matter
who particularly it benefits.
You have always wondered what it
would be like to have a White Christmas.
Santa
Anna is the name of a hated dictator, not a type of a certain other
state's weather patterns.
You leave natural disasters like
volcanic eruptions and earthquakes for other states to deal with -- you
have your own worries about tornadoes (if you live in the north),
hurricanes (along the coast), or floods (just about everywhere).
You have probably never actually seen
a desert before in person.
You might have actually ridden on a
horse before, but would never seriously
entertain thoughts of using it as regular transportation -- certainly
not when the next town is still over an hour away by car.
You have little need ever to cross a state
line (which is hours away by car), unless you are doing important
business, in which case you would prefer to fly.
Outside of rural areas, where they
are actually useful, the wearing of boots and cowboy hats is an
affectation. Because you live in a city, you see them fairly
rarely. Exceptions, like the attending of a rodeo, are exceptions
that prove the rule.
They don't call the armadillo the
unofficial roadbump for nothing.
Ah, what would we do without
football?
If you're under the age of, say, 30 and are
male, like everyone you played soccer as a child, but you put this
away for more interesting sports like (American) football, baseball
or basketball in your mid to late teens. Your first reaction to hockey
is "What's that?" -- but if you do play hockey, you always do so
inside,
since it never gets cold enough outside.
To you the idea of state supported
schools without industrial-scale sports programs is probably
inconceivable.
If you're from a traditional
religious background (like the Southern Baptist Church), you also might
secretly harbor desires to reinstate school prayer. On the other
hand, if you're a Southern Baptist, you probably think the
Southern Baptist national convention is too conservative even for your
tastes, and may have considered secession from that church; that, at
any rate, has been your local convention's opinions.
You attend religious services at
least monthly if not weekly. It is not unusual
to attend midweek religious services in addition. The Divine
(in some manifestation) is an important element in your life, and
although there's no question that church and state should remain
separate, you
think such a separation has been used as an excuse to discriminate
against
religious people. Talking about religion is in bad taste only in
mixed company.
You think a political system
dominated by two parties is only natural, and might be a little shocked
and disturbed to find that there are people who really do believe in
leftist ideologies -- you think Bill Clinton is quite
"liberal". If you're a Republican, there is a very good chance you are
the first generation in your family. If you lean towards European-style
socialism, you probably live in a city and might have immigrated from
some other state. If you're not a social conservative, you
sympathize with the Libertarian Party but could never bring yourself to
vote for them -- they're just too wacky.
You expect state legislators of both
major parties to get along with each other to get things accomplished,
and expect them to maintain the universal consensus that favors
business and social conservatives. You are generally not disappointed
in either of these respects.
Schooling is one of the great
exceptions
to your anti-statist attitudes. Education should
be universal, and the state should do what it takes to fund it. Tuition to a state-run university is ridiculously
cheap, by American standards: usually around $3,5001
per semester for permanent residents of the State, thanks in large
part to the Permian
Basin. Every once in a while, if the state budget is
running a surplus, you might find this amount reduced even further.
If you graduate in the top 10% of your highschool class, you are
guaranteed a place in one of these state-run schools, though private
schools, such as Rice, are usually
more prestigious.
The state encourages students in primary and secondary
school to say the pledge of allegiance to the United States at the
beginning of each school day, as well as a separate
pledge to the State of Texas, but in neither case are the students
actually obliged to do so.
As a student you have to go through
several years of history about early Native populations, the Texan
Revolution and Republic, and then general American and European
history, especially British and French history. You probably know some
about the rest of the world -- but not a lot.
Texas' quasiautonomous
relations with Mexico are of practical importance to you, especially if
you do business in the Valley (by which of course you mean the
Rio Grande Valley). You look at California's treatment of immigrants
and shake your head. You don't have much of a problem with
bilingual education, and see English-only legistlation for government
use as a nonstarter politically, if only because it would exclude that
20-30% of the population that speaks Spanish at home.
You see radical pacifism as every bit as dangerous as
militarism. This does not, however, in your opinion justify any
given decision to go to war.
Conservative government is meant
quite literally: while Texas's debtor
protection
laws are the most liberal of any state, that is because
they have always been that way -- since 1839 at any rate, when Texas
was a sovereign nation. This meant, e.g., that one's household
furnishings, food, farm vehicles or implements, tools of trade, wearing
apparel, jewelry, two guns, motor vehicles, farm animals, pets, life
insurance, health aids (e.g. a wheelchair), unpaid commissions for
personal service and current wages, and many more, can to this day not
be seized by collection agencies.
There's a good chance you own a gun,
though you don't think you would likely ever need one for anything but
hunting for sport; there is, however, no question in your mind that
anybody should be able to obtain one easily, whatever the case.
You'd rather that the government not
spend so much money and time with social programs, although you don't
mind the idea of their being there for you if you need them. You prefer
other social institutions (like your local church, synagogue or mosque)
to carry out those duties instead. You are far more likely to donate
to charity than New Yorkers or Californians.
You find it strange if there is a
public outcry that the State would execute a convicted criminal, and
might become a little curious why such events ever make the national or
even world news (heck, executions are commonplace, right?). While you
do not really question the legitimacy of capital punishment as such,
recently you have begun thinking
more needs to be done to ensure fair judicial proceedings.
Not only do you think that the
bureaucrats in Washington are pernicious and generally not to be
trusted, but that much fuss could be avoided were most of that
authority to be delegated to the State government, or better, to
individual local governments. You would not mind the concomitant
responsibility that would require of you, especially when it comes to
schooling. You agree with the state constitution in this respect.
A State income tax is anathema to
you. You probably took former Gov. Anne
Richards at her word when she said it was either that or a state
lottery. The less money going to the government, the less they can
abuse it (which is why your legislators are among the worst
paid in the country2). A federal income
tax of more than, say, 35% is practically obscene, and the idea
of city income taxes (like in New Orleans or New York City) can
be the source of conversations with the theme "Who are they?".
Unlike some states, you have the
right to hold a job without being obliged to join a union. You know
unions exist elsewhere, but you
don't belong to one unless you're a teacher.
Who are they?
Crossing the Border is easy
for you, but not so for the people living on the
other side.
The nationality people most often makes jokes about is
Mexican, but you would never admit to it if you make them
yourself.
While most non-Texans immediately
understand basic culinary concepts such as the enchilada and the taco,
it usually takes you a little more explanation for such items as
chicken-fried steak or, worse, chicken-fried chicken. If the idea of
TexMex comes up, you're used to other people thinking you're just using
another word for Mexican. As for Taco Bell, that's neither Mexican nor
TexMex -- it's fastfood. Period.
You've had Blue Bell icecream before. You're used to non-Texas corporations hyping their
supposed Texanness to sell you beer, cars, hamburgers and such.
Aside from English, the next language
you are most likely to speak
at home is Spanish, of course. After that
(and depending on where you live), some German dialect, some variety of
French, Vietnamese, Chinese or Korean. In school
just about everybody takes Spanish; people who take other languages are
either nonconformists or otherwise acting impractically. Only a
comparably small intelligentsia takes French, German, Latin, or any of
the more exotic European or Asian languages.
Friendliness and hospitality are
virtues not to be taken lightly -- after
all, that's what the state's name means3.
If someone totally unknown says hello to you in some public
place, you wave back to them and think nothing of it, since to
do otherwise would risk offending that person. In most any
non-fastfood restaurant, you expect the waiter or waitress to meet you
at the door,
show you to your seat, and read
your mind as to when you want more water, which should of course be
free.
As a result, you don't mind so much when they fill your glass up
before you've asked them. However old, stopping to visit with the
neighbors
unannounced is not considered rude -- it's considered being a
good-neighbor
and showing your continued interest in them, as long as you don't
overdo
it or take advantage of their hospitality.
When someone stops by your home to
visit, you ask them if they want something to eat or drink, and if
they refuse, you go get them something anyway. When you invite
others over, generally you should provide the main course, although
it's not unusual for the invitees to bring something too, depending on
how many people are coming. When you invite others to go out to
eat at a restaurant, there is no assumption that you will be
automatically obliged to pay the costs of both/all meals, unless it's a
special occasion (such as a birthday), in which case you will be so
obliged. However, on such special occasions the invitation should
be made explicitly for the special occasion, since simply asking others
if they want to get something to eat is ambiguous.
When some neighbor or nearby relative is seriously ill or
has died, you know it is incumbent on you to bring some kind of food,
preferably a dish you have cooked yourself, to ease their burden or
grief.
Not making eye-contact is something just short of
rudeness; it's anti-social at the very least. People who
don't make eye-contact aren't serious, or aren't paying attention to
you. You're taught from a very early age to have very firm
handshakes, lest you be taken as uninterested in the
person you're speaking with or it be taken as a sign of lack of
resolve.
You think people don't say "Ma'am" or "Sir" as much as they
should.
Of course, you hold strong opinions about how other
countries and places behave and how you're not like them. You're not as
rude as Northerners, nor as naive as Californians, nor as corrupt as
Louisianians, nor as poor as Arkansans, nor as decadent as continental
Europeans; you're ambivalent about the British. To the extent that you
are aware of their existence, all Canadians are
polite and sensitive. You think Mexicans are unsophisticated, but
lively and
warm.
Owning a house as an adult is what
you expect as a matter of course, not something you just wish for.
Given the choice of whether you'd rather have a better heater or a
better air conditioning system, obviously, you'd take the air
conditioner. (Why would anyone want more
heat?)
Not only do you remember the Alamo,
you remember Goliad,
too.
The date comes second, as in the rest
of the US: 3/2/1836 (and you know what happened on that date).
1 x 109 = 1 billion. 1 x 1012
= 1 trillion.
You live in a state that has been
conquered only once, and you know it has flown under six different
flags at various times; you probably, however, couldn't name them 4.
You can rest
safely at night knowing that funds from the regulation of the
oil and gas companies help maintain among the best roads in the nation
(that's your opinion, anyway). So, why bother with public
transport? We never needed the TGVs anyway -- we all have at
least one if not two or more cars, after all, right? Gas is cheap
-- usually right around a dollar per gallon -- depending on how
close you are to the oil refineries on the Gulf Coast. Riding on a
subway
is a novel experience for you, you have great disdain for your local
bus
system even if you use it, and no one but outsiders use taxis.
Oil to you is something you buy at
the gas station, not something you get rich off of, or profit directly
from.
You still measure just about
everything in the customary system of feet, pounds and gallons. You
have, of course, also been taught the metric system in school, but the
only practical use that comes of it is in buying softdrinks. [Incidentally, you describe any such softdrinks
generically as "coke" despite the actual brand name. Certainly not
"soda" or "pop".]
The only times one does not
say "y'all" when talking to two or more people is in highly formal
situations, or on television 5.
Saying "you people" can be seen as rude as result.
You might know an eccentric or two
who considers the War Between the States as one predominantly about
Northern Yankee imperialism, which you
find unsettling; but as for those people who
want to secede (again), they're just taking things too far.
The age of the Revolution
and the Republic
was a glorious period that helped found a Texan national consciousness.
You think that, unlike other states, the despot overthrown was a
genuine despot, and the battles far more romantic. You irritate
non-Texans by frequent reference to this.
On March 2, the day on which Texas
celebrates its independence from Mexico, or on April
21, the anniversary of the Battle
of San Jacinto, you might find yourself in public parades and
events,
and singing patriotic songs like "Texas, our Texas". You probably think
that the people who complain about it being racist are trying to take
away your heritage, or, alternatively, have ulterior political motives.
If you are African-American, on June 19 you probably take
part in your local Juneteenth
celebrations to commemorate the day in 1865 on which slaves in Texas
first heard the news of the Emancipation Proclamation. If you are of Hispanic descent, similar events may
occur on May 5th, which, Hispanic or not, you would call by its Spanish
name, Cinco de Mayo, as well as on that other fiesta
patria, Diez y Seis de Septiembre.
The likelihood that you identify as a
Southerner decreases at a roughly regular rate as you move from East to
West. But there's about a 25% chance, according to a recent Zogby
poll, that you will consider yourself first
a Texan, and only second an American.
1 By
comparison, Texans attending such schools pay less than five times the
average yearly tuition that most undergraduates in the United Kingdom
pay ($1,770 -- The Economist, 23 January 2003), rather than
ten, twenty
or thirty times as throughout the rest of the U.S.
5 It's actually considerably more
complicated than that. At the highest register, such as in writing or
in formal speeches, neither y'all nor its possessive form y'all's
can be used, and you and your must be used for both
singular and plural readings. At the next register down,
generally used in everyday speech with business associates or in public
places, the distinction between you (sg.) and y'all is
maintained, but the possessive must be your in both the
singular and the plural. At the lowest level, used among friends
and family, y'all and y'all's are both the rule for
plural forms, while you and your are used for the
singular. Any of these forms is of course available in any
context, but their rhetorical effects may differ. For instance,
the use of a more formal you (when meant plurally) will
introduce social distance between the speech participants and probably
a note of seriousness or sobriety, whereas the use of y'all (or
indeed y'all's) will add a colloquial, more emotionally warm
feeling to the discourse. Note too that the set of speech-act
participants included in y'all need not always be physically
present, and this has become grammaticalized in the circumstance of
speaking to a representative of a group (such as a waiter in a
restaurant) as long as the person being spoken to is acting in his or
her function as a representative of the larger group. Thus,
claims of a so-called singular y'all ought
to be looked on with caution and skepticism, as they are generally made
by speakers for whom y'all is not native and who thus are
not aware of this peculiarity of its usage. Also, all of the
above applies
for purely for y'all as used in subject of the sentence, though
there
is a discernible tendency for the distinction between you and y'all
to be lost when used as direct object or as an object of a
preposition; where exactly the distinction is lost varies greatly
according to dialect and idiolect.