MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C73CA8.830650F0" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C73CA8.830650F0 Content-Location: file:///C:/9CE9C637/TheEvolutionofMindandMorality--2007.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
The Evolution of Mind and Morality:
19th-21st Centuries
Winter, 2007
Instructo=
r:
Course
Assistants: P.-J. Benson and =
Aidan
Gray
&=
nbsp; This
lecture-discussion course will focus on theories of the evolution of mind a=
nd
moral behavior. We will begin=
with
Spencer and Darwin’s conception of mental and moral evolution, and th=
en
jump to the last part of the 20th century, examining the develop=
ment
of sociobiology. The last par=
t of
the course will concentrate on the central feature of evolutionary psycholo=
gy,
as that new discipline has come to be known, and on contemporary theories of
the evolution of ethical behavior and understanding.
I. Books for the course:
The follo=
wing
books for the course are in the
And as a
recommended text (relevant parts are photocopied in course packet)
There is =
a course
packet, which will be for sale in the
=
II. Course
Requirements:
=
=
&=
nbsp; A. The texts for discussion must be
thoroughly read, and everyone should be prepared to discuss the primary mat=
erial. The recommended readings should al=
so be
examined, especially as aids for papers and discussion.
=
=
&=
nbsp; B. In the first half of the class, the
instructor will provide short lectures to introduce topics drawn from the
readings. In the second half =
of
each class, discussion will be initiated from one page papers that all stud=
ents
must have produced for that class.
These papers—no longer than one page—should state some
problem or central aspect of the reading for that class and then take a pro=
or
con position in respect to the material developed. These should not be summaries of t=
he
reading, but the articulation of an important thesis contained therein and a
critical stance in respect of that thesis. Undergraduate students should send =
the
papers to the “drop box” on the Chalk site for the course; grad=
uate
students should send the papers to the instructor via email attachment. These papers should be sent by noo=
n of
the Monday before class. On t=
hese
and all papers, you should make sure your name is on them and that you indi=
cate
whether you are an undergraduate or graduate student.
=
&=
nbsp;
=
&=
nbsp; C. Two 8-10 page papers on the materi=
al of
the course, the first due on February 6 and the second on March 9 (on this
latter date, the papers should be turned in by noon to the Fishbein Center,
Social Sciences Research Building, room 205).
=
&=
nbsp;
=
III. Office
hours: TT, 1:15-3:00 p.m. (an=
d by
appointment), Social Science Research 205.=
=
=
&=
nbsp; Phone: 702-8348. Fax: 743-8949. Email: r-ri=
chards@uchicago.edu. Webpage: http://home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/.
I.<=
span
style=3D'font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> =
Introduction: Sc=
ope of
the Considerations (Jan. 9)
A. =
Recommended
II.=
=
Darwin and Huxle=
y: Theory of Mind in Nature (Jan. 16)=
A. =
Texts for Discus=
sion:
1. =
2. =
T. H. Huxley,
“On the hypothesis that Animals are Automata, and Its History”
(1874). In Selected
B. =
Recommended
1. =
Richards,
2. =
James Moore and Adrian Desmond, “Introduction” to the
Penguin edition of the Descent.&nbs=
p;
In Selected
3.&n=
bsp;  =
;
Richards, Review of Moore and Desmond’s edition, British
Journal for the History of Science 39 (2006): 615-17. In Selected
III=
. =
Spencer, Darwin,=
and
Huxley: Evolution of Morality (Jan. 23)
A. =
Texts for Discus=
sion:
1. =
Darwin, Desce=
nt of
Man, chaps. 3 and 5.
2. =
Spencer,
“Preparation in Biology,” in his The Study of Sociology (Michigan: University of Michigan [1873],
1961). In Selected
3. =
Thomas Henry Hux=
ley,
“Evolution and Ethics” (1893; esp. note 20). In Selected
4. =
Recommend
IV.=
=
Sociobiology (Ja=
n 30)
A. =
Text for Discuss=
ion:
1. =
Edward O. Wilson=
, Sociobiology:
the New Synthesis (Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1975), chaps. 1 and 27.
2.&n=
bsp;  =
;
Sociobiology Stu=
dy
Group of Science for the People, “Sociobiology–Another Biologic=
al
Determinism” (1976). In=
Selected
3. =
Edward O. Wilson,
“Academic Vigilantism and the Political Significance of
Sociobiology” (1976). I=
n Selected
B. =
Recommend
1. =
Richards,
2. =
Steven Pinker, <=
i>The
Blank Slate: the Modern Denial of Human Nature (
V.<=
span
style=3D'font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> =
Evolutionary Psy=
chology:
the Foundations (Feb. 6)
A. =
Texts for Discus=
sion:
1. =
John Tooby and L=
eda
Cosmides, “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology,” =
in
David Buss (ed.), The Handbook of
Evolutionary Psychology (
2. =
Richard Samuels,
“Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis”
(1998). In Selected
3. =
David Buller, “Mind,” Adapting Minds (
VI.=
=
Evolutionary
Psychology: Mate Preferences and Attractiveness (Feb. 13)
A. =
Texts for Discus=
sion:
1. =
David Buss, R=
20;The
Strategies of Human Mating,” =
American
Scientist 82 (1994):
238-49. In Selected
2. =
Bruce Ellis,
“The Evolution of Sexual Attraction: Evaluative Mechanisms in
Women” The Adapted Mind, chap. 6. In Selected
3. =
Martin Voracek e=
t al.,
“Shapely Centrefolds?
Temporal Change in Body Measures:&n=
bsp;
Trend Analysis,” Briti=
sh
Medical Journal 325 (2002), 1447-1448; and (22 February & 27 May,
2003). In Selected
4. =
David Buller,
“Mating,” Adapting Mind=
s
(
VII=
. =
Evolutionary
Psychology: Social Adaptations for Reasoning. (Feb. 20)
A. =
Texts for Discus=
sion:
1. =
Leda Cosmides an=
d John
Tooby, “Neurocognitive Adaptations Designed for Social Exchange,̶=
1;
in in David Buss (ed.), The Handboo=
k of
Evolutionary Psychology (
2. =
Evolutionary Cog=
nitive
Psychology---Also added.
3. =
David Buller,
“Adaptation,” Adapting =
Minds,
chap. 3. In Selected
4. &nb=
sp; Leda
Cosmides and John Tooby, “Detecting Cheaters,” Trends in &=
nbsp; Cognitive
Sciences (November 2005).
VII=
I. =
General Evaluati=
on of
Evolutionary Psychology (Feb. 27)
A. =
Texts for Discus=
sion: &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
1. =
Steven Rose, =
220;Escaping
Evolutionay Psychology,” Alas=
, Poor
Darwin (
2. =
Anne Fausto-Ster=
ling,
“Beyond Difference: Fem=
inism
and Evolutionary Psychology,” in Alas,
Poor
3. =
Anne Campbell,
“The Essential Woman:
Biophobia and the Study of Sex Differences,” in her A Mind of Her Own: The Evolutionary Psychology of Wom=
en
(
4.&n=
bsp;  =
;
Edward Hagen, “Controversial Issues in Evolutionary
Psychology,” in David Buss (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary
Psychology, chap. 3. In Selected
IX.=
=
Evolutionary Eth=
ics (March
6)
A. =
Texts for Discus=
sion:
1. =
Robert Boyd and Peter Richerson, “Cult=
ural
Evolution of Human Cooperation,” in their The Origin and Evolution of Cultures (
2.&n=
bsp;  =
;
Frans de Waal,
“Morality Evolved,” in his Primates
and Philosophers: How Morality
Evolved (
3.&n=
bsp;  =
;
Philip Kitcher, “Ethics and Evolution: How to Get There from Here,”=
in de
Wall, Primates and Philosophers, pp. 120-39. In Selected
4.&n=
bsp;  =
;
Robert J. Richar=
ds,
“A Defense of Evolutionary Ethics,”
B. =
Recommend
1.&n=
bsp;  =
;
Paul Farber,
“Evolutionary Ethics since 1975,” in his The Temptations of
Evolutionary Ethics (Los Angles: University of California Press,
1994). In Selected
2. =
Peter Woolcock,
“The Case Against Evolutionary Ethics Today,” in Biology and=
the
Foundation of Ethics, eds.