parent nodes: 42 USC 1983 | abstention | common law | Contracts | Costello v Fazio | derivative suit | duty of loyalty | fiduciary duty | habeas corpus and 42 USC 1983 | piercing the corporate veil | Railroad Commission of TX v Pullman | specific performance | Younger v Harris

remedies at equity

A court may allow equitable relief where the remedy at law (i.e., damages) are inadequate.

In determining whether the remedy in damages would be adequate, the following circumstances are significant:
(a) the difficulty of proving damages with reasonable certainty,
(b) the difficulty of procuring a suitable substitute performance by means of money awarded as damages, and
(c) the likelihood that an award of damages could not be collected.

Rest 2d Contracts 360

Generally, the more unique or uncertain the value of promised performance, the less adequate legal remedies will be. Compare [Manchester Dairy System v Hayward] (contract for milk only from certain cows) with [Van Wagner Advertising Corp v S n M Enterprises] (breached lease of Manhattan billboard).

Particular situations
Types of equitable remedy Cases
[Van Wagner Advertising Corp v S n M Enterprises] (refusing specific performance for breached lease of Manhattan billboard)
[Fitzpatrick v Michael] (contract to take care of widow and manage deceased husband's estate)



[alias: equitable remedies]
[alias: equitable remedy]
[alias: equity]
[alias: equitable]