parent nodes: 42 USC 1983 | abstention | administrative common law | burden of proof | Calabresi corollary | civil commitment | common law | Compensatory Damages | condition precedent | consequential damages | Contracts | damages for land contracts | derivative suit | duty to mitigate | executive immunity | expectancy damages | Filartiga v Pena-Irala II | habeas corpus and 42 USC 1983 | Hawkins v McGee | Henningsen v Bloomfield Motors | Hoffman v Red Owl Stores | invasion of privacy | libel | liquidated damages | Negligence Torts | negotiable instrument | Parklane Hosiery Co v Shore | permanent damages | Punitive Damages | qualified immunity | Rasul v Bush | real property | Real Property | reliance damages | remedies at equity | Rule 4 | specific performance | Spur v Del E Webb | Torts | unconscionability | Wolofsky v Behrman

Damages

Tort damages:
  1. Compensatory Damages
  2. Punitive Damages
  3. [Nominal Damages]

    Contract damages:

    "Virtually any breach gives the injured party a claim for damages for at least nominal damages, 'to which ... for reasons we do not understand every victim of breach of contract, unlike a tort victim, is entitled.' Farnsworth on Contracts 12.8 (quoting Chronister Oil Co. v Unocal Ref. & Mktg., 34 F.3d. 462, 466 (7th Cir. 1994) (Posner, C.J.))

    Contract remedies generally

    (First, bargaining)
    Is a valid contract formed?
    If yes, is there breach?
    If breached, does the contract provide for liquidated damages?
    Are the liquidated damages a penalty?
    If yes, the liquidated damages are unenforceable
    If no, the liquidated damages apply
    If not, there is an ambiguity in the contract, and default rules apply
    expectation damages:
    -no speculation about damages
    -only foreseeable damages apply (cf. consequential damages)
    -the injured party has a duty to mitigate
    -the cost of performance is the default rule
    -use the change in expected value if performance is wasteful, unreasonable, or impossible
    reliance damages
    -the injured party has a duty to mitigate
    -no speculation about damages
    restitution damages
    -there must be partial performance of the contract
    -measured by the unjust enrichment of the defendant by the plaintiff minus P's own enrichment
    equitable remedies:
    -specific performance
    -damages for land contracts
    -injunction
    -recission
    - for cases of mutual mistake of fact or unilateral mistake
    - damages for land contracts
    - lack of competency
    If no, is there reliance on the invalid contract?
    Does promissory estoppel apply?
    If so, P can get reliance damages
    If not, P gets nothing

    Types of contract remedies

    Remedies at law:
  4. expectation damages remedy the interest in realizing the value of expectancy created by another's promise; attempt to put the plaintiff in as good a position as it would have been had the contract been performed
    consequential damages
  5. reliance damages attempt to put the plaintiff back in the position in which that party would have been had the contract not been made
  6. damages for land contracts

    Equitable remedies:
    injunction
    [test damages] attempt to prevent unjust enrichment by allowing a party to to recover values conferred on the other party through efforts to perform a contract
    quantum meruit
    specific performance
    recission

    Non-damage remedies:
  7. liquidated damages and penalties
  8. [non-compete clause]s

    Limitations on damages
    avoidability limitation
    foreseeability limitation
    emotional loss limitation

    Economic analysis of contract remedies

    Where
    c=cost of performance
    p=price of party's performance=100
    v=value of party's performance

    Cost Seller's desire Kaldor-Hicks expectation damages specific performance
    (p-c>0) (v>c) (50)

    50 perform perform perform perform

    120 breach perform perform perform

    200 breach breach breach breach

    Notice that
    (1) the buyer and seller can negotiate around remedies, even specific performance (see Coase Theorem)
    (2) specific performance has low transaction costs for the court

    See Calabresi corollary
    [icon: skull]
    [alias: damages]
    [alias: remedies]
    [alias: remedy]