Economic Limits on Rational Democratic Redistribution
I begin with an economic environment familiar from welfare- and political-economic literatures and show how, with quantitatively reasonable distributions of labor productivity and tax-price-elasticities of taxable income, middle class consumers are (personally) worse off with any negative income tax scheme than they would be with no redistribution at all. This finding has important implications for political-economic theories of redistribution, because it implies that the fully informed median voter cannot be expected to support programs of cash redistribution from rich to poor – such as the negative income tax – merely on the basis of his personal benefits from the program. It also implies that the median voter model of redistribution is, in the empirically relevant range, inconsistent with a positive correlation between income distribution skewness and the amount of rich-poor redistribution. Indeed, I suggest that the median voter may be expected to support regressive cash transfer programs.
My numerical calculations were made with a Quattro-Pro spreadsheet.
Click here to send email to me requesting an Acrobat copy of the paper.
The request should include your email address and institutional
© copyright 2001 by Casey B. Mulligan.