Economics 309. Social Choice and Voting Models
Course description: The course begins with an introduction to fundamental
results of social choice theory, including impossibility theorems and majority-rule
tournaments. We then study game-theoretic models of turnout and information-aggregation in
two-candidate elections, multi-candidate voting under different voting rules, and
post-electoral bargaining among elected representatives.
Winter 2001: Tues,Thurs 12:00-1:20 pm in SS 105. Instructor: Roger Myerson.
Principal recommended texts:
R. Myerson, "Foundations of social choice theory" Northwestern DP (1996)
available at http://www.kellogg.nwu.edu/faculty/myerson/research/1162.pdf
[ASB]: D. Austen-Smith and J. S. Banks, Positive Political Theory I, UMichigan Press
(1999).
[PT]: T. Persson and G. Tabellini, Political Economics, MIT Press (2000).
Other texts:
[M]: H. Moulin, Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making, Cambridge (1988).
[R]: W.H. Riker, Liberalism against Populism, W. H. Freeman (1982).
R. Myerson, "Large Poisson
games," Journal of Economic Theory 94 (2000), 7-45.
R. Myerson, "Comparison of
scoring rules in Poisson voting games," Northwestern DP#1214 (2000).
Computational models in Excel: LEDYARD.XLS, SWING.XLS.
Course outline and readings:
I. Fundamentals of social choice theory
A. Foundations of political institutions
Myerson "Foundations" section 1.1.
R. Hardin, "Why a Constitution," in The Federalist Papers and the New
Institutionalism, Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman, eds., NY: Agathon Press (1989), p.
100-119.
B. Impossibility of ideal social choice function
Myerson "Foundations" sections 1.2, 1.3.
[ASB] chapter 2.
[M] sections 10.1, 10.5, 11.2, 11.5-7.
K. J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley, 1951.
Amartya K. Sen, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, 1970.
A. Gibbard, "Manipulation of voting rules: a general result," Econometrica 41,
1973.
M. A. Satterthwaite, "Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions," Journal of
Economic Theory 10, 1975.
A. Gibbard, "Straightforwardness of game forms with lotteries as outcomes,"
Econometrica 46 (1978).
E. Muller and M. Satterthwaite, "The equivalence of strong positive association and
strategy-proofness," Journal of Economic Theory 14 (1977), 412-418.
E. Maskin, "The theory of implementation in Nash equilibrium: a survey," in L.
Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler, and H. Sonnenschein eds., Social Goals and Social Organization,
Cambridge U. Press (1985).
D. Abreu and A. Sen, "Virtual implementation in Nash equilibrium," Econometrica
59 (1991).
J. Moore, "Implementation in Environments with Complete Information," in
Advances in Economic Theory: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of the Econometric
Society, J.-J.Laffont ed., Cambridge U. Press (1992).
M. Jackson, "Implementation in undominated strategies: a look at bounded
mechanisms," Review of Economic Studies 59 (1992) 757-775.
J. C. Harsanyi, "Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and
interpersonal comparisons of utility," Journal of Political Economy 63
(1955).
C. Majority rule
[ASB] chapter 3
K. O. May, "A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple
majority decision," Econometrica 20, 1952.
D. C. McGarvey, "A theorem in the construction of voting paradoxes,"
Econometrica 21, 1953.
D. Binary agendas
Myerson "Foundations" section 1.4
[M], section 9.4
R. McKelvey and R. Niemi, "A multistage game representation of sophisticated voting
for binary procedures," Journal of Economic Theory 18 (1978), 1-22.
R. Farquharson, Theory of Voting, Yale, 1969.
B. Sloth, "The theory of voting and equilibria in noncooperative games," Games
and Economic Behavior 5 (1993), 152-169.
E. Top cycle
Myerson "Foundations" section 1.5
[ASB] chapter 6.
N. Miller, "Graph theoretical approaches to the theory of voting," American
Journal of Political Science 21, 1977.
R. B. Myerson, Game Theory, Section 4.10.
R. McKelvey, "Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some
implications for agenda control," Journal of Economic Theory 12, 1976.
R. D. McKelvey, "General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting
models," Econometrica 47, 1979.
F. The uncovered set and Banks set for tournaments
[M], pages 246-7 and 254-5, and sections 9.1 and 9.2.
J. F. Laslier, Tournament Solutions and Majority Voting, Springer-Verlag (1997).
N. Miller, "A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting," American
Journal of Political Science 24, 1980 (erratum 1983).
K. Shepsle and B. Weingast, "Uncovered sets and sophisticated voting outcomes, with
implications for agenda institutions," American Journal of Political Science 28,
1984.
J. Banks, "Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control," Social Choice and
Welfare 1, 1985.
H. Moulin, "Choosing from a tournament," Social Choice and Welfare 3, 1986
G. Axiomatic derivation of scoring rules for multicandidate elections
[M], Sections 9.1 and 9.3
R. Myerson, "Axiomatic Derivation of Scoring Rules without the Ordering
Assumption," Social Choice and Welfare 12 (1995), 59-74.
H. P. Young, "Social choice scoring functions," SIAM Journal of Applied
Mathematics 28, 1975.
J. Smith, "Aggregation of preferences with a variable electorate," Econometrica
41, 1973.
II. Elections with two alternatives
A. Two-party competition in tournaments.
Myerson "Foundations" section 1.6
R. McKelvey, "Covering, dominance, and institution-free properties of social
choice," American Journal of Political Science 30, 1986.
David C. Fisher and Jennifer Ryan, "Optimal strategies for a generalized 'scissors,
paper, and stone' game," American Mathematical Monthly 99 (1992), 935-942.
G. Laffond, J.F. Laslier, and M. Le Breton, "The bipartisan set of a tournament
game," Games and Economic Behavior 5 (1993), 182-201.
B. Median voter theorems
Myerson "Foundations" section 1.7
[ASB] chapter 4.
H. Hotelling, "Stability in competition," Economic Journal 39 (1929), 41-57.
C. D'Aspremont, J.-J. Gabszewicz, and J.-F. Thisse, "On Hotelling's 'Stability in
Competition,'" Econometrica 47 (1979), 1145-1150.
J. S. Gans and M. Smart, "Majority voting with Single-Crossing Preferences,"
Stanford University discussion paper, 1994.
C. Two-candidate competition in Euclidean policy space
[ASB] chapter 5.
Black, Theory of Committees and Elections, chapter 4.
O. Gross and R. Wagner, "A continuous Colonel Blotto game," RAND Research
Memorandum RM-408 (1950), Santa Monica, CA.
"Example IV.6.3" in G. Owen, Game Theory, Academic Press (1982), 78-83.
G. Kramer, "A dynamical model of political equilibrium," Journal of Economic
Theory 16 (1977), 310-334.
C. Supermajority voting with a status quo
[M], Sections 10.3, 10.4, 11.4
A. Caplin and B. Nalebuff, "On 64% majority rule," Econometrica 56, 1988;
and "Aggregation and social choice: a mean voter theorem," Econometrica 59,
1991.
D. Costly voting
R. Myerson, "Population uncertainty and Poisson games" International
Journal of Game Theory 27 (1998), 375-392.
R. Myerson, "Large Poisson games," Journal of Economic Theory 94 (2000), 7-45.
T. R. Palfrey and H. Rosenthal, "A strategic calculus of voting," Public Choice
41, 1983.
T. R. Palfrey and H. Rosenthal, "Voter participation and strategic uncertainty,"
American Political Science Review 79, 1985.
J. Ledyard, "The pure theory of large two-candidate elections," Public Choice 44
(1984), 7-41.
C. J. Uhlaner, "Rational turnout: the neglected role of groups," American
Journal of Political Science 33 (1989), 390-422.
E. Private information and the Condorcet jury theorem
D. Austen-Smith and J. Banks, "Information aggregation, rationality, and the
Condorcet jury theorem," American Political Science Review 90:34-45 (1996).
T. Feddersen and W. Pesendorfer, "The Swing Voter's Curse," American Economic
Review 86 (1996), 408-424; and Voting behavior and information aggregation in elections
with private information," Econometrica 65 (1997), 1029-1058.
R. Myerson, "Extended Poisson games and the Condorcet jury theorem," Games and
Economic Behavior 25 (1998), 111-131.
E. Dekel and M. Piccione, "Sequential voting," Journal of Political Economy 108
(2000), 34-55.
H. P. Young, "Condorcet's theory of voting," APSR 82 (1988), 1231-1244.
S. Lohmann, "Electoral incentives, political transparency, and the policy bias toward
special interests," APSR 92 (Dec 1998).
R. Myerson, "Informational origins of political bias towards critical groups of
voters," European Economic Review 43 (1999), 767-778.
III. Multiparty competition.
R. Myerson, "Analysis of Democratic Institutions: Structure, Conduct,
and Perfomance," Journal of Economic Perspectives 9:1 (1995), 77-89.
R. Myerson, "Economic analysis of political institutions: an introduction,"in
Advances in Economic Theory and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, volume 1, edited by
D. Kreps and K. Wallis (Cambridge University Press, 1997), pages 46-65.
R. Myerson, "Theoretical comparisons of electoral systems," European Economic
Review 43 (1999), 671-697.
A. Policy competition with a fixed number of parties.
K. Shepsle, Models of Multiparty Competition, Harwood (1991), Parts I and II.
R. Myerson and R. Weber, "A theory of voting equilibria," American Political
Science Review 87 (1993) 102-114.
D. Rae, V. Hanby, J. Loosemore, "Thresholds of representation and thresholds of
exclusion," Comparative Political Studies 3 (1971), 479-488.
G. Cox, "Electoral equilibrium under alternative voting institutions," American
Journal of Political Science 31 (1987), 82-108.
G. Cox, "Centripital and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems," American
Journal of Political Science 34 (1990), 903-935.
R. Myerson, "Incentives to cultivate favored minorities under alternative electoral
systems," American Political Science Review 87 (1993), 856-869.
R. Myerson, "Comparison of scoring rules in Poisson voting games," Northwestern
DP#1214 (2000).
B. Competition with entry.
K. Shepsle, Models of Multiparty Competition, Harwood (1991), Parts III and IV.
T. J. Feddersen, I. Sened, and S. G. Wright, "Rational voting and candidate entry
under plurality rule," American Journal of Political Science 34 (1990), 1005-1016.
M. Osborne, "Candidate positioning and entry in a political competition," Games
and Economic Behavior 5 (1993), 133-151.
W. H. Riker, "The two-party system and Duverger's law," American Political
Science Review 76 (1982), 753-766.
T. R. Palfrey, "A mathematical proof of Duverger's law," in Models of Strategic
Choice in Politics, ed. by P. C. Ordeshook, University of Michigan Press (1989), 69-91.
T. Feddersen "A Voting Model implying Duverger's Law and Positive Turnout,"
American Journal of Political Science 36, 938-962 (1992).
G. Cox, "Strategic Voting Equilibria under SNTV: the M+1 rule," UCSD (1992).
S. R. Reed, "Structure and behavior: extending Duverger's law to the Japanese
case," British J. of Political Science 20 (1990), 335-356.
A. Lijphart, "The political consequences of electoral laws, 1945-1985," American
Political Science Review 84 (1990), 481-496.
J. Carey and M. Shugart, "Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of
Electoral Formulas," Electoral Studies 14 (1995).
M. J. Osborne, "Spatial models of political competition under plurality rule: a
survey of some explanations of the number of candidates and the positions they take,"
Canadian Journal of Economics 28 (1995), 260-301.
M. J. Osborne and A. Slivinski, "A Model of political competition with
citizen-candidates," Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (1996), 65-96.
T. Besley and S. Coate, "An economic model of representative democracy,"
Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1997), 85-114.
C. Electoral deterrents against abuse of power
Riker, Liberalism against Populism, chapters 1 and 10.
R. Myerson, "Effectiveness of electoral systems for reducing government
corruption," Games and Economic Behavior 5 (1993), 118-132.
R. Myerson "Proportional representation, approval voting, and coalitionally
straightforward elections," in Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and
Representation, edited by W. Barnett, M. Hinich, and N. Schofield, Cambridge U. Press
(1993).
J. S. Banks and R. K. Sundaram, "Adverse selection and moral hazard in a repeated
elections model," in Barnett, Hinich, and Schofield, eds., Political Economy (1993).
D. Austen-Smith and J. Banks, "Electoral accountability and incumbency," in P.
Ordeshook, ed., Models of Strategic Choice in Politics, U. of Michigan Press (1989),
121-148.
J. Ferejohn, "Incumbent performance and electoral control," Public Choice 50
(1986), 5-25.
S. Rose-Ackerman, Corruption and Government (Cambridge U. Press, 1999).
D. Campaign contributions
R. Morton and C. Cameron, "Elections and the theory of campaign contributions: a
survey and critical analysis," Economics and Politics 4 (1992), 70-108.
J. M. Snyder, "Campaign contributions as investment," Journal of Political
Economy 98 (1990), 1195-1227.
G. M. Grossman and E. Helpman, "Electoral competition and special interest
politics," Review of Economic Studies (1996).
R. Morton and R. Myerson, "Decisiveness of Contributors' Perceptions in
Elections," Northwestern DP 1023 (1992).
IV. Legislatures and separation of powers
A. Measures of bargaining power
D. P. Baron and J. Ferejohn, "Bargaining in legislatures," American
Political Science Review 83 (1989), 1181-1206.
T. Groseclose and J. Snyder, "Buying supermajorities," American Political
Science Review 90 (1996), 303-315.
L. Shapley and M. Shubik, "A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a
committee system," American Political Science Review 48 (1954), 787-792.
B. Strategic voting and coalition formation in legislatures
D. Austen-Smith and J. Banks, "Elections, coalitions, and legislative
outcomes," American Political Science Review 82 (1988), 405-422.
M. Laver and N. Schofield, Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition Formation in
Europe, Oxford University Press (1990).
G. Cox, The Efficient Secret, Cambridge U. Press, (1987).
M. Laver and K. Shepsle, Making and Breaking Governments Cambridge (1997?).
D. Baron, "A Noncooperative Theory of Legislative Coalitions," American Journal
of Political Science 33 (1989), 1048-1084.
B. Peleg, "Coalition formation with dominant players," International Journal of
Game Theory 10, (1981) 11-33.
D. Diermeier and T. J. Feddersen, "Voting cohesion in presidential and parliamentary
legislatures," American Political Science Review 92 (1998), 611-621.
V. V. Chari, L. E. Jones, and R. Marimon, "The economics of split voting in
representative democracies," American Economic Review 87 (1997), 957-976.
M. S. Shugart and J. M. Carey, Presidents and Assemblies, Cambridge U. Press (1992).
C. Subcommittees and specialization in legislatures
K. A. Shepsle, "Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional
voting models," American Journal of Political Science 23 (1979), 27-59.
B. R. Weingast and W. J. Marshall, "The industrial organization of congress"
Journal of Political Economy 96 (1988), 132-163.
T. W. Gilligan and K. Krehbiel, "Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational
Legislature," American Journal of Political Science 34 (1990), 531-564.
R. D. McKelvey and R. Riezman, "Seniority in legislatures," American Political
Science Review 86 (1992), 951-965.
D. Diermeier and R. Myerson, "Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal
organization of legislatures" American Economic Review 89 (1999), 1182-1196.
M. Laver and K. Shepsle, Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government, Cambridge (1994).
J. Huber, "Restrictive legislative procedures in France and the United States,"
APSR 86 (1992), 675-687.
D. Legislative electoral formulas
R. Taagepera and M. S. Shugart, Seats and Votes, Yale (1989).
M. L. Balinski and H. P. Young, Fair Representation, Yale (1982).
A. Lijphart, Electoral Systems and Party Systems Oxford (1994).
URL of this course page: http://home.uchicago.edu/~rmyerson/econ309.htm |